Complaint Status (Admin) :
Complaint Status (User) :Not Filed
Cathedral City, CA
68700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero, Cathedral City, CA
92234
Fax:(760) 770-0399
Phone:(760) 770-0300
Complainant:
Full Legal Name :XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Sex:Female
Age:66
Residence Address :XXXXXXXXXXXXX
City, State, Zip Code :Montclair
Residence Phone :XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Cell/Pager :XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Bus. Phone :XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Facts:
Date & Time of Occurence:09-17-2007 13:30
Location of Occurrence :Cathedral City, CA
Employee #1 Involved :Chief Stan Henry
ID # :
Employee #2 Involved :Sgt. Charles Robinson
ID # :
Witness #1:XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Residence Address & Street Number :XXXXXXXXXXXXX
City, State, Zip Code :XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Residence Phone :XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Cell/Pager :XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Witness #2:XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Residence Address & Street Number :XXXXXXXXXXXXX
City, State, Zip Code :XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Residence Phone :XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Cell/Pager :XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Narrative:
I am 66 years old and live on Social Security.
I have lost everything and need justice to be done.
Following is a Time Line that shows conspiracy, misdonduct
abuse, and a "void on the face" restraining orders:
There is absolute proof of a criminal
conspiracy between Cathedral City Police
Department, Assemblywoman Bonnie Garcia
and The Cathedral City Attorney.
The proof is in their 65 page Memorandum
of Costs, which corresponds to this Time Line,
and is documented in the "void on the face"
restraining order INC 043437 - ROBINSON et al v. STEPHENS --
all to save two police officers, believed to be
Sergeant Charles Robinson, and Captain Kevin Connor
who slandered and demonized me to the Assemblywoman
Bonnie Garcia.
I have been unconscionably and illegally charged 0,000 in order to destroy me and to protect two police officers. This is the most unethical and unconscionable thing, "under color of law", any person in law can do.
THE PROOF of conspiracy is written in their own words in
their Memorandum of Costs.
THE PROOF of the void on the face restraining order is documented in the law of the State of California. I was preparing to go into Appeal Court when I was falsely arrested and therefore my Appeal was dismissed. However,"an appeal has no effect on a void on the face judgment" so I ought to still
be able to take this into court and have it dismissed and have my money returned to me.
"An appeal will not prevent the court from at any time lopping off what has been termed a dead limb on the judicial tree -- a void order." MacMillan Petroleum Corp. v. Griffin (1950) 99 Cal. App. 2d 523, 533 [222 P.2d 69]; accord:People v. West Coast Shows, Inc. (1970) 10 Cal. App.
3d 462, 467 [89 Cal. Rptr. 290]; Svistunoff v. Svistunoff
(1952) 108 Cal. App. 2d 638, 641-642 [239 P.2d 650];
and see: 6 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (2d ed. 1971)
Appeal, § 7, pp. 4024-4025.)
The Cathedral City Police Department personnel, starting with Chief Stan Henry, have been responsible for ruining my physical and mental health, my name and my reputation, stolen 0,000 and my home -- all to protect these two police officers.
The City Manager, Don Bradley, and every member of the
Cathedral City Council are just as responsible for allowing this rogue police department for injustice.
From my NOTES: I put together this limited Time Line to
correspond to the Memorandum of Costs . There is a more
complete one in the case file in court.
COMPARATIVE TIME LINE TO MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
Jan 29, 2004: I am called into Cathedral City Police for an
investigation” into a false police report and arrest
by Sergeant Charles Robinson and Captain Kevin
Connor, who had refused me help many times in the
past with the drug people, conducted the interview. I
told them I had an appointment that same morning at
the Office of Assemblywoman Bonnie Garcia, which
is next door to the police department, I kept that
appointment with Mary Brhel, aide to Garcia and
spoke of the about the problems in homeowner associations, trying to gain support to change some of
the laws that encumber people. We had a good
discussion; she complimented me on being an
advocate, and gave me a bouquet of flowers when I
left. She said she would call me in a couple of days.
Feb 2, 2004: Mary Brhel did call. She tells me “two Cathedral City officershad been in to visit her and had told her such terrible things about me that she had put me on a ‘Threat List’ in Sacramento,” and then hung up on me, refusing to tell me the names of the police officers. That meant I the next thing to a terrorist, and could not attend
any meetings in Sacramento regarding homeowner problems. Later, her story would be confirmed when her Chief of Staff, Richard Harmon told another Homeowner Advocate, Madeline Patterson, the same thing.In retrospect, I can see that the police thought I was going to talk about them, and they took it upon themselves to discredit, and demonize me so that I would not be believed.
Feb. 2, 2004: I immediately called Judy Williams, the Cathedral City Administrative Secretary to, and requested an investigation. She hung up on me.
Feb 3 2004 What was happening, secretly, behind my back: The very next day, after I called and requested an investigation into the two officers who went to the Garcia Office, was the beginning of a provable conspiratorial “investigation” against me with The City of Cathedral City, Cathedral City Police Department, Chief Stan Henry, Captain Kevin Connor, Captain Holcomb, Sergeant Charles Robinson, and Assistant City Attorneys, Kendall Berkey and William Medlan, who started a Memorandum of Costs, all trying to make it seem I was making a false police report, that I was "crazy" (I didn't find this out until October 2004)
I also went to City Council, where only one member, Bud England
agreed there needed to be an investigation into the two officers. However, the investigation never happened, and, has never happened to this day.
Feb 11, 2004 Cathedral City Police Chief, Stan Henry had me served with a bogus TRO, that never went through the courts, (abuse of process). And, all police officers were told by Captain John Holcomb not to take any calls from me, or even to talk to me. They were then behaving as though there was a “real”TRO against me. Yes, that information is in the Memorandum of Costs. In other words they were not
allowing me to make either police reports or complaints, and
not even taking any phone calls from me. Sergeant Patton
threatened me twice with arrest if I went to the police
department to make any reports or complaints. When I made
a complaint by mail it was ignored by Stan Henry.
All of this to protect two police officers.
Feb 25, 2004, The one time I happened to catch Secretary, Judy Williams in her office, she said, "The only time we will talk with you is
when you have a 911 medical emergency, or someone is killing you. WE will not take any police reports regarding your homeowner's association!" and then hung up on me. This has proved to be true to this day. I later learned in the Memorandum of Costs that they had conspired against me
with the association board members, and Mary Brhel.
Four [4] months after being to the Garcia Office, Mary Brhel,
married to ex Deputy District Attorney, Martin Brhel,
is granted eight [8] orders, (Case INC 043179) for which
she had no witnesses and no police reports to back up
her absolutely outrageous lies. Assemblywoman Bonnie Garcia
allowed for this to happen, never once speaking to me as to
whether it was true.
Commissioner McCoy, in Indio has agreed to
drop this “void on the face" restraining order
if I have Mary Brhel and Richard Harmon properly served.
Assistant City Attorney, Kendall Berkey has provable, through
subordination of perjury, conspired with Mary Brhel to file these eight bogus restraining orders against me -- four [4] month after I had been to the Garcia Office. It is documented in the Memorandum of Costs, and in court records.
Penal Code 127. Every person who willfully procures another
person to commit perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury,
and is punishable in the same manner as he would be if personally guilty of the perjury so procured.
Also recorded:Berkey's contact with a newspaper reporter,
Cindy Uken who writes a totally libelous article against me,
April 5 2004 Finally I was just fed up with the police not
talking to me, and being put off on making a report. So, I
called the number for dispatch, and asked again for a report to
be taken. Dispatcher, Danielle Pascual, at the insistence of
her Watch Commander, Sergeant Charles Robinson,
continued to hang up on me. Every time she would hang up, I
would call back. I wasn't keeping count ], but it was about 30
times.
Penal Code 653m. (a…Nothing in this subdivision shall
apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made in good faith [such as making a police report]
Penal Code 653y. Calling 911 is an infraction, and
no one is arrested.
Sergeant Charles Robinson, arrests me saying I was "making harassing, obscene/threatening calls to 911," which was a blatant lie, but it was used to falsely arrest me.
When I later asked for the 911 tapes they of course could not produce them. When I asked for the police report, I was not allowed to have it until July 2005 when the police report was changed to show I was not making harassing phone calls.
In court, under oath, Dispatcher, Danielle Pascual did admit
I was only trying to make a police report, [being the victim of
two officers who went to the Office of Bonnie Garcia] and
she told the judge she was capable of taking police reports.
April 15, 2004: Sergeant Charles Robinson took all of
the HOA board members from Shadow Crest HOA to meet with Indio, Deputy District Attorney, Charles Gianguzi, trying to get me arrested and in jail, using my HOA members -- all of whom had lied to get “void on the face” Restraining Orders against me to keep me out of Board Meetings, because I began to speak out about the crimes I had learned of in the HOA. --I learned of about the DA plot when I was served. The judge denied all of their requests to arrest me; I received the court decisions in the mail.
May 28, 2004 I am served with a TRO and restraining order request from Sergeant Charles Robinson, Dispatcher, Danielle Pascual, Records keeper Melissa Holcomb, and husband of Captain Holcomb, and Secretary to the Chief, Judy Williams.
On the same day I am served with eight [8] restraining orders
from the Office of Assemblywomen Bonnie Garcia, four
months after I was in her office, and they are all
granted on or about – August 3, 2004.
Oct. 2004, I didn't know what The City, and the police were doing in their conspiracy efforts at this time but once I received the City Attorney’s 65 page Memorandum of Costs for illegal and unconscionable fees of ,000 fees for this void on the face Restraining Order they were granted against me, (INC 043437 - ROBINSON et al v STEPHENS) on May 28, 2004, that they kick started with a false police report and a false arrest, fraud and conspiracy. Assistant City Attorney, Kendall Berkey suppressed the evidence of the false police report and false arrest from the court.
In spite of the provable perjury by Danielle Pascual, in particular, under oath, Judge Hawkins ives the CCPD what
turns out to be a void on the face restraining order he calls a
"slippery sloop decision." (The false police report is never
introduced into the case, and CCPD will not give me a copy.)
When I received the Memorandum of Costs from The Cathedral City, City Attorney, they had documented the names of every person the Cathedral City Police Department, and Cathedral City Council had conspired with over several months, racking up
more and more money each day, but proving nothing against me. Soon, this bogus investigation, that proved NOTHING but their own entangled conspiracy with a cost of 0,000 which is collected while I am incarcerated in June of 2006,
and preparing an appeal.
All I had asked for was that the police to do their job and investigate the event at the Garcia Office, and treat women fairly in the homeowner association
This is a similar case that was won on an appeal as the judgment was void on the face for not meeting statutory criteria.
.CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v. Pamela J. SORGES, Defendant and Appellant. Cal.App. 4 Dist.,
June 11, 2004 [E033692]; APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Bambi J. Moyer, Temporary Judge. Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Reversed with directions. Pamela J. Sorges, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Dennis W. Dawson, Supervising
Deputy Attorney General, and David M. Tiede, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. OPINION McKINSTER.
Cathedral City continually used the Restraining Order as a battle-axe against me to make sure I got no police reports on these incidents,and guaranteeig the two officers will never be investigated,
I am still not allowed any police reports.
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241
Conspiracy Against Rights
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 245 Federally Protected Activities
Twenty-seven [27] Cathedral City Police Officers filed against
Chief Stan Henry and his administration for violations of civil
and constitutional rights as well as labor problems, so, this
administration is well versed in abuses of rights.
[FEDERAL COURT EDCV 02-965, CV 04 02931
Download : Cathedral City
Size: KB, downloaded 97 times
Size: KB, downloaded 97 times



